Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: an evidence gap map

Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: an evidence gap map

3ie Evidence gap map report 5

Kristen Rankin, James Jarvis-Thiébault, Nadine Pfeifer, Mark Engelbert, Julie Perng, Semi Yoon and Anna Heard

Adolescence (ages 10–19) is a critical time period in life during which people undergo extensive biological, psychological and social changes. Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) plays an integral role during adolescence and can affect many aspects of a person’s life during and after this time. Programming that addresses this health area has the potential to greatly improve not only adolescents’ SRH, but also their overall health and their ability to reach their full potential.

To best invest finite resources in programming aimed at improving adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH), decision-makers need to know what works and what does not, particularly within a low- and middle-income country (L&MIC) context. Impact evaluations – studies using experimental or quasi-experimental methods to measure effectiveness – help answer these questions, as do high-quality systematic reviews.

We sought to identify the key gaps in the evidence of the impact of ASRH programming in developing country settings by creating an evidence gap map of impact evaluations and systematic reviews.

Main findings in the gap map

Overall, we find that while there is a considerable amount of impact evaluation evidence, it only addresses some questions within this broad topic. Often with a narrow scope of outcomes, many studies do not address the diversity of adolescents or the effect of social norms. Furthermore, we note a wide range of quality in reporting, and that studies often include inadequate descriptions around the context of the evaluation, the interventions and associated theories of change. The question of cost-effectiveness is notable in its absence from the research questions.

High-quality synthesis that focuses on specific intervention types for adolescents in L&MICs is largely missing. There are opportunities for researchers to take the next step from reviewing the evidence on a broad topic, such as HIV prevention, to seeking answers around specific approaches, outcomes and adolescent sub-populations.

3ie has an interactive and dynamic online platform which allows users to explore the evidence included in a particular EGM, with links to user-friendly summaries of all studies.

3ie also produced a scoping paper that reviews the supply of and demand for evidence from impact evaluations and systematic reviews on ASRH interventions. It reveals several areas where a high demand for evidence combined with low or moderate supply of evidence suggest the need for further research.

EGM12

Agricultural innovation: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2017
This report outlines the main findings of an evidence gap map referring to agricultural inputs, practices and programmes aimed at improving farmers’ productivity and well-being.

EGM11

Social, behavioural and community engagement interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: An evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2017
This report outlines the main findings of an evidence gap map on social, behavioural and community engagement interventions related to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health programmes in L&MICs.

Understanding financial agricultural risk for smallholder farmers in developing countries: what do we know and not know?

Understanding financial agricultural risk for smallholder farmers in developing countries: what do we know and not know?

Evidence gap map 3ie 2017

This evidence gap map report examines the evidence on financial agricultural risk management instruments for smallholder farmers.

Evidence for peacebuilding: an evidence gap map

Evidence for peacebuilding: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2015

Around 70 per cent of fragile states have seen conflict since 1989 and 30 per cent of official development assistance is spent in fragile and conflict-affected situations.

Land-use change and forestry programmes: evidence on the effects on greenhouse gas emissions and food security

Land-use change and forestry programmes: evidence on the effects on greenhouse gas emissions and food security

Evidence gap map 3ie 2016

This report presents the findings of an evidence gap map that assesses the evidence available on the effects of land-use change and forestry programmes on greenhouse gas emissions and human welfare