Skip to main content
Subscribe

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Donate
3ie

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Research Commissioning Centre
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional policies and reports
    • Contact us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Evidence impact summaries
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication studies
  • Impact

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Research Commissioning Centre
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional policies and reports
    • Contact us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Evidence impact summaries
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication studies
  • Impact

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Donate

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Evidence hub
  3. Publications
  4. Systematic reviews
  5. Why targeting matters: a systematic review of farmer field schools targe...
  • Publications
  • Briefs
    • Evidence gap map
    • Evidence use
    • Impact evaluation
    • Learning summary
    • Programme overview
    • Systematic review
    • Replication studies
    • Working paper
    • Other briefs
  • Evidence gap maps
  • Impact evaluations
  • Replication papers
  • Scoping papers
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systematic review summaries
  • Working papers
  • Other evaluations
Systematic reviews
Why targeting matters: a systematic review of farmer field schools targeting

Why targeting matters: a systematic review of farmer field schools targeting

3ie Systematic Review 11

Daniel Phillips, Hugh Waddington and Howard White

  • Article
  • Related Content

Targeting in any development intervention is critical, as it impacts programmes outcomes. This review studies targeting in farmer field school (FFS) programmes. It covers how these programmes are targeted, whether targeting is successful (did programmes reach their intended beneficiaries) and how targeting affects outcomes of interest.

The authors, Daniel Phillips, Hugh Waddington and Howard White, find that while some FFS programmes include equity criteria to target the poorest and most disadvantaged farmers, a majority of the programmes use effectiveness to promote inclusion of farmers with more resources, more education and greater social agency. Programmes emphasising effectiveness were found to have greater impact on yields and did better on adoption of practices. At the same time, studies also showed poorer farmers benefitted more when they participated directly in FFS programmes than when they received knowledge indirectly.

Systematic Review on the Effect of Skills-Based Active Labor Market Interventions on Migration Outcomes

Systematic Review on the Effect of Skills-Based Active Labor Market Interventions on Migration Outcomes

Systematic review 3ie 2023  
The authors of this systematic review assess the effects of skill-based active labor market interventions on migration outcomes. This study was commissioned by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) through USAID’s project, Addressing the Root Causes of Irregular Migration in Guatemala.

Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies

Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies

Systematic review 3ie 2021  
The authors of this systematic review assess the effects of gender-specific and transformative interventions on women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile and conflict-affected states and their contribution to building peaceful and inclusive societies.

Strengthening intergroup social cohesion in fragile situations

Strengthening intergroup social cohesion in fragile situations

Systematic review 3ie 2021  
In this review, Sonnenfeld and colleagues synthesise evidence on programmes that promote intergroup social cohesion as a means of supporting sustainable peace in fragile communities in low- and middle-income countries.

Effects of access to electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle- income countries

Effects of access to electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle- income countries

Systematic review 3ie 2020  
In this review, Moore and colleagues synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes for households, firms and communities in low- and middle- income countries.

Incentives for climate mitigation in the land use sector – the effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on environmental and socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-method systematic review

Incentives for climate mitigation in the land use sector – the effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on environmental and socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-method systematic review

Systematic review 3ie 2019  
This review by Snilsveit and colleagues examines evidence from 18 economic incentives-based payment for environmental services programmes to understand the effectiveness on environmental and socio-economic outcomes.

    Tools

  • View full report
    EN |
  • Download full report
    EN |
  • View summary
    EN |
  • Print Page
  • Share this page
     
  • DOI : 10.23846/SR0011

About Footer

  • About

Services Footer

  • Services

Our work

  • Research

Evidence hub

  • Evidence Hub

Donate

  • Donate
 

Copyright © 2025 International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)| All rights reserved | Terms of use | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement