Agricultural Innovation Evidence Programme

Tran Thi HoaWorld Bank

Despite the availability of agricultural technologies, few smallholder farmers in developing economies adopt new inputs and practices. One of the factors preventing this is the lack of effective knowledge dissemination. Farmers also face different constraints along the value chain, including lack of financial resources and inadequate infrastructures or market inefficiencies, which can restrain farmers’ abilities to increase their productivity and limit their subsequent well-being.

3ie’s agricultural innovation evidence programme supports evaluations aimed at understanding how best to encourage farmers to adopt new inputs and practices.

Overview

Since 2012, 3ie has supported 13 rigorous policy-relevant impact evaluations and one formative evaluation of programmes that enhance agrarian livelihoods. We fund evaluations of interventions that encourage farmers to adopt new technologies, contribute to environmental sustainability, improve their socioeconomic well-being and increase their agricultural production. This evidence programme is a multi-stakeholder collaboration of the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the International Fund for Agricultural Development and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.

What have we learned so far?

To capture lessons learned from implementing the programme, we have compiled some resources that might be useful for researchers, commissioners of evaluation and others.

Report | Summary of our learning workshops
3ie organised two learning workshops in partnership with AGRA and IFAD to share the findings, lessons and policy implications of the studies conducted. In November 2019, we co-organised the workshop with AGRA in Nairobi, and in February 2020, we partnered with IFAD in Rome. Read the workshop report

Brief: Managing and implementing impact evaluations: lessons from 3ie agricultural innovation grants
This learning brief draws from the preliminary challenges and lessons from the ongoing impact evaluations under 3ie’s agricultural innovation thematic window. These include lessons on study design and methodology, study implementation, and engagement during the course of an impact evaluation. It provides a point-in-time reference for researchers and evaluation commissioners to anticipate and mitigate some of the challenges associated with conducting impact evaluations of agricultural interventions. Read the brief

Blog: Bringing research down to earth
In this blog, Mark Engelbert, an evaluation specialist with 3ie shares his thoughts after a field visit to a 3ie-funded evaluation team in Malawi. Read the blog

Blog: Implementing impact evaluations: trade-offs and compromises
In this blog, Diana Milena Lopez Avila, a former evaluation specialist with 3ie shares insights after a workshop organised by 3ie and IFAD for the grant teams under the Agricultural Innovation Evidence Programme. Read the blog

Additional resources

Why is it difficult to evaluate agricultural programmes | Olivier Cossee
In this interview with 3ie, Olivier Cossee, senior evaluation officer at FAO discussed some key questions pertaining to impact evaluations of agricultural programs. He also stresses the importance of qualitative research and policy relevance of impact evaluations. Watch the video

Impact evaluation of a soil fertility programme in Ghana | Simrin Makhija
In this interview,3ie grantee Simrin Makhija talks about a 3ie-funded evaluation of an intervention to promote integrated soil fertility management among smallholder farmers in the Volta region of Ghana. Watch the video

Impact evaluation of a smallholder dairy commercialisation programme in Kenya| Juan Bonilla
In this interview, 3ie grantee Juan Bonilla talks about a 3ie-funded impact evaluation of small dairy commercialisation programme in Kenya. This programme was funded by IFAD under the rural development projects. Watch the video

Impact evaluation of an integrated soil fertility management practices in Malawi | Annemie Maertens
In this interview, 3ie grantee Annemie Maertens talks about early findings from a 3ie-funded impact evaluation in Malawi on the effects of these two primary models on farmer learning and adoption of integrated soil fertility management practices. Watch the video

Do farmers learn from extension services? Evidence from Malawi | Annemie Maertens
In this 3ie Delhi seminar, Annemie Maertens, senior lecturer in economics, University of Sussex, presented results from a 3ie-funded impact evaluation in Malawi on the effects of these two primary models on farmer learning and adoption of integrated soil fertility management practices. Watch the video

Related content

Mapping the evidence on agricultural innovation programmes

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie PDF icon 2018  
This brief outlines the main findings of an evidence gap map on impact evaluations and systematic reviews referring to agricultural inputs, practices and programmes aimed at improving farmers’ productivity and well-being.

Managing and implementing impact evaluations: lessons from 3ie agricultural innovation grants

Learning summary Brief 3ie PDF icon 2018  

This learning brief draws from the preliminary challenges and lessons from the ongoing impact evaluations under 3ie’s agricultural innovation thematic window.

Does information on agricultural technology encourage adoption?

Impact evaluation Brief 3ie PDF icon 2018  
This brief is based on the findings of an impact evaluation that examines the role of information in addressing the constraints smallholder farmers in Kenya face in adopting agricultural inputs.

Evaluating agricultural information dissemination in western Kenya

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2018  

This impact evaluation by Fabregas and colleagues examines the role of information in addressing the constraints smallholder farmers in Kenya face in adopting agricultural inputs.

Agricultural innovation: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie PDF icon 2017  
This report outlines the main findings of an evidence gap map referring to agricultural inputs, practices and programmes aimed at improving farmers’ productivity and well-being.

Making networks work for policy: evidence from agricultural technology adoption in Malawi

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2016  

This report by Beaman et al. tests training diffusion partners chosen using a theory-based selection approach and whether it leads to greater adoption of new agricultural technologies in Malawi.

Evaluating agricultural information dissemination in western Kenya

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2018  

This impact evaluation by Fabregas and colleagues examines the role of information in addressing the constraints smallholder farmers in Kenya face in adopting agricultural inputs.

Making networks work for policy: evidence from agricultural technology adoption in Malawi

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2016  

This report by Beaman et al. tests training diffusion partners chosen using a theory-based selection approach and whether it leads to greater adoption of new agricultural technologies in Malawi.

Sustainability of impact: dimensions of decline and persistence in adopting a biofortified crop in Uganda

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2016  

This study by McNiven S, Gilligan, DO and Hotz C, studied the sustainability of impact of an agricultural intervention that promoted the adoption and consumption of biofortified orange sweet potato

Assessing the impact of farmer field schools on fertiliser use in China

Impact evaluation 3ie PDF icon 2015  

In China, a major agricultural challenge is the inefficient use of fertilizer and the environmental effects associated with overuse.

There are no systematic reviews
There are no evidence gap maps
There are no replication studies
There is no related content.