Skip to main content
Subscribe

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Donate

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional policies and reports
    • Contact us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Evidence impact summaries
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication studies
  • Impact

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional policies and reports
    • Contact us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Evidence impact summaries
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication studies
  • Impact

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Donate

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Evidence hub
  3. Publications
  4. Evidence gap maps
  5. Evidence for peacebuilding: an evidence gap map
  • Publications
  • Briefs
    • Evidence gap map
    • Evidence use
    • Impact evaluation
    • Learning summary
    • Programme overview
    • Systematic review
    • Replication studies
    • Working paper
    • Other briefs
  • Evidence gap maps
  • Impact evaluations
  • Replication papers
  • Scoping papers
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systematic review summaries
  • Working papers
  • Other evaluations
Evidence for peacebuilding: an evidence gap map

Evidence for peacebuilding: an evidence gap map

3ie Evidence Gap Map Report 1

Drew B Cameron, Annette N Brown, Anjini Mishra, Mario Picon, Hisham Esper, Flor Calvo and Katia Peterson

  • Article

  • Related Content

Around 70 per cent of fragile states have seen conflict since 1989 and 30 per cent of official development assistance is spent in fragile and conflict-affected situations. The challenge is to make evidence-informed investments so that peacebuilding interventions can achieve positive impacts, even in situations where development indicators are worsening. 

This report by Drew B Cameron, Annette N Brown, Anjini Mishra, Mario Picon, Hisham Esper, Flor Calvo and Katia Peterson is based on a 3ie evidence gap map (EGM) for the impact evaluation of peacebuilding interventions developed in 2015. It describes the scope and methods for the EGM and the analysis of the information in the map. The EGM reveals two intervention categories, community-driven reconstruction and psycho-social programmes for victims, with a large number of studies that are thus promising for evidence synthesis research. There is little to no evidence available for most of the other 23 categories, while five categories have no completed or ongoing studies.

While we have updated the map since, an offline, excel version is still available for download.

Our new map includes recent studies and highlights gaps that persist. Use the links below to access the latest evidence:

  • Building peaceful societies: evidence gap map (2020)
  • Building peaceful societies: evidence gap map report (2020)
  • Building peaceful societies: brief (2020)
  • The current state of peacebuilding programming and evidence: scoping paper (2015)

Strengthening good governance in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map

Strengthening good governance in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2023
 
Authors of this report present findings from an evidence gap map of interventions that aim to strengthen governance effectiveness in low-and middle-income countries.

Promoting political competition through elections in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map

Promoting political competition through elections in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2023
 
Authors of this report presents the findings of a systematic search to identify and map the evidence base of impact evaluations and systematic reviews of interventions that aim to promote political competition effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries.

Agriculture-led Growth in Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Evidence Gap Map

Agriculture-led Growth in Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Evidence Gap Map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2023
 
This report provides an overview of the available impact evaluations and systematic reviews on agriculture-led growth interventions to support decision-making in global agricultural development. This map was commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

Food systems and nutrition: Describing the evidence from 2000 to 2023

Food systems and nutrition: Describing the evidence from 2000 to 2023

Evidence gap map 3ie 2023
 
The authors of this report map the latest impact evaluations and systematic reviews that assess the effects of food systems interventions on food security and nutrition outcomes in low-and middle-income countries. This is a mid-term report that provides an overview of the evidence up to January 2023.

Addressing the systemic causes of malnutrition: The nutrition-sensitive agriculture evidence gap map

Addressing the systemic causes of malnutrition: The nutrition-sensitive agriculture evidence gap map

Evidence gap map 3ie 2023
 
The authors of the report systematically describe the available evidence on the effects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions across food systems in low-and middle-income countries. This map was commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

    Tools

  • View report
    EN |
  • Download report
    EN |
  • Download map (excel)
  • Print Page
  • Share this page
     
  • DOI : 10.23846/EGM001

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

About Footer

  • About

Services Footer

  • Services

Our work

  • Research

Evidence hub

  • Evidence Hub

Donate

  • Donate

 

Copyright © 2023 International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)| All rights reserved | Terms of use | Privacy policy