Skip to main content
Subscribe

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Evidence hub
  3. Publications
  4. evidence gap map
  5. Mapping the evidence on social, behavioural and community engagement for...
  • Publications
  • Briefs
    • Evidence gap map
    • Evidence use
    • Impact evaluation
    • Learning summary
    • Programme overview
    • Systematic review
    • Replication studies
    • Working paper
    • Other briefs
  • Evidence gap maps
  • Impact evaluations
  • Replication papers
  • Scoping papers
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systematic review summaries
  • Working papers
  • Other evaluations
EGM B7

Mapping the evidence on social, behavioural and community engagement for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health

  • Article

  • Related Content

This brief combines the findings from the evidence gap map on adolescent, sexual and reproductive health and the social behavioral and community engagement interventions map for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. The World Health Organisation commissioned this brief to highlight the main findings and common limitations related to both subjects and identify possible areas for future research.

Context

Over the last few decades, there have been significant improvements in the health and well-being of women, adolescents and children, however, gains have been uneven and inequalities persist.

Social, behavioural and community engagement (SBCE) interventions address the capabilities of individuals, families, communities and health providers to better identify and respond to health needs. Such interventions are considered fundamental to realising improved health and well-being for women, children and adolescents. SBCE interventions include interpersonal communication and health education activities, delivery of health messages, engagement through mass and social media, interventions that address financial barriers (including cash transfers) and interventions to formalise community participation in health planning and programming.

To support the implementation of effective and sustainable programmes and direct research funding to where it is most needed, decision makers need access to existing high-quality evidence on intervention effectiveness. 3ie has recently produced two evidence gap maps (EGMs) that cover SBCE interventions across a spectrum of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health.

To bring the findings of these two projects together, the World Health Organisation (WHO) commissioned 3ie to produce a policy brief. The brief highlights the main findings and common limitations related to SBCE interventions across the two EGMs and summarises areas for future research.

The brief pulls together findings from the following two EGM reports:

  • Social, behavioural and community engagement interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: evidence 
    gap map
  • Adolescent sexual and reproductive health evidence gap map report: In this report, SBCE interventions are examined within a broader framework of interventions. This report was produced by 3ie.

Main findings from the RMNCH and ASRH gap maps

We find that while a considerable amount of evidence already exists for SBCE interventions for RMNCH and ASRH, there are still critical gaps in the impact evaluation and systematic review evidence bases.

We identified a number of limitations common across studies in this literature. These should be considered in the design and reporting of future impact evaluations and systematic reviews to help improve and advance research on SBCE interventions:

  • Studies rarely report on outcomes related to the enabling environment, such as health provider attitudes and communication skills, or social norms;
  • Analysis of how SBCE intervention effects vary by vulnerable or marginalised populations  is frequently missing;
  • M-health and other ICTs play an increasingly stronger role in SBCE programming, but there is limited evaluation evidence available;
  • The usefulness of studies is often limited by inadequate reporting, including in descriptions of context of the evaluation, interventions and study design;
  • Few of the studies included qualitative components or process evaluation
  • It was rare for studies to include information on cost or cost effectiveness analysis;
  • There are very few evaluations of interventions in francophone African countries, despite evidence of SBCE programming in this region; and
  • A significant share of the systematic review evidence base has methodological limitations. These limitations include unclear inclusion criteria for interventions and health topics, no use of independent screening or data extraction, missing risk of bias assessments of included studies and use of vote-counting approaches.

Use the links below to access 3ie’s interactive EGM platform

Explore the evidence gap maps on 3ie’s interactive platform
ASRH evidence gap map 
RMNCH evidence gap map

To explore the EGMs by health area:
Reproductive health evidence gap map
Maternal health evidence gap map
Newborn health evidence gap map
Child health evidence gap map

Key publications
Download the 3ie ASRH EGM report
Download the 3ie brief on SBCE interventions

Agriculture-led growth in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence gap map

Agriculture-led growth in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence gap map

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie 2023
 
The authors summarize the impact evaluations and systematic reviews of agriculture-led growth interventions to support decision-making in global agricultural development. This work was commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

Addressing the systemic causes of malnutrition: a nutrition-sensitive agriculture evidence gap map

Addressing the systemic causes of malnutrition: a nutrition-sensitive agriculture evidence gap map

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie 2023
 
This brief is based on an evidence gap map that examines the effects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions across food systems in low-and middle-income countries. This work has been commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

Strengthening resilience against shocks, stressors and recurring crises in low- and middleincome countries: an evidence gap map

Strengthening resilience against shocks, stressors and recurring crises in low- and middleincome countries: an evidence gap map

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie 2023
 
This brief is based on an evidence gap map of interventions that aim to strengthen resilience against shocks, stressors, and recurring crises in low-and middle-income countries. This map was commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

Mapping water, sanitation, and hygiene achievements to prosperity, stability, and resilience outcomes

Mapping water, sanitation, and hygiene achievements to prosperity, stability, and resilience outcomes

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie 2023
 
This brief is based on a systematic map of research that measures the association between select water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) outcomes and high-level development outcomes in prosperity, stability, and resilience. This brief has been commissioned by USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.

Lessons from six evidence gap maps on women’s political empowerment

Lessons from six evidence gap maps on women’s political empowerment

Evidence gap map Brief 3ie 2023
 
The brief is based on studies identified by six evidence gap maps commissioned by USAID’s Center for Democracy, Human Rights and Governance on women’s political empowerment.

    Tools

  • View brief
    EN |
  • Download brief
    EN |
  • View full report
  • View interactive map
  • Print Page
  • Share this page
     
  • DOI : 10.23846/B/EGM/20174

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

About Footer

  • About

Services Footer

  • Services

Our work

  • Research

Evidence hub

  • Evidence Hub

Support Us

  • Support Us

 

Copyright © 2023 International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)| All rights reserved | Terms of use | Privacy policy