Increasing immunisation in Ogun State, Nigeria: a formative evaluation of a participatory action research intervention

What we offer
At the core of our work, impact evaluations are rigorous studies that measure the effects of international development programmes. We focus on conducting impact evaluations on policy-relevant research questions where credible findings can drive decision-making.

3ie invented evidence gap maps, which provide a visual overview of existing and ongoing studies or reviews in a sector or sub-sector of international development. These maps help policymakers find the most relevant evidence for a given question, thereby improving decision-making.

Our synthesis products, including systematic reviews, integrate findings from multiple different studies which address a common research question. Because they look systematically across the evidence base to see what works and why, systematic reviews and other synthesis products are more reliable for decision-making than results from a single study used in an ad hoc way.

Often, policy decisions must be made quickly. To make sure that decision-makers get the evidence they need when they need it, 3ie has developed a set of helpdesk services and rapid evidence products. Our Rapid Response Briefs and Rapid Evidence Assessments draw from the latest high-quality research to answer policy questions in a fraction of the time of traditional evaluations or systematic reviews.

We work with governments and other organizations to build their capacities in evaluation and evidence-informed decision-making. In addition to providing trainings on a wide range of evaluation methods, we offer ongoing support services to ensure our partners have access to the most up-to-date evidence and evaluation tools.

3ie specialises in increasing access to, demand for and use of evidence by governments, parliaments, programme managers, civil society, programme participants and the media. We do this by emphasising the value of planning and engaging with stakeholders to ensure that evaluations and reviews are relevant and useful. We use robust and effective monitoring to measure evidence use so that we can convey evidence impact on programmes and policies with greater confidence.

Since 3ie was founded, transparent, reproducible and ethical evidence (TREE) have been core considerations in our work. We have developed and refined tools and best practices to ensure our studies apply technically rigorous methodologies, transparently share design and analysis decisions, yield computationally reproducible analysis, and incorporate foundational principles of research ethics into design, implementation, and dissemination. 3ie’s transparent, reproducible and ethical evidence (TREE) Policy articulates this commitment to TRE best practices.
Evidence hub
3ie’s Development Evidence Portal is the largest-of-its-kind repository of rigorous evidence on what works in international development. This portal includes evaluations and synthesis of studies conducted in low-and middle-income countries. It combines records from 3ie’s Impact Evaluation and Systematic Review repositories, as well as, evidence gap maps.

These provide a visual display of completed and ongoing systematic reviews and impact evaluations in a sector or sub-sector, structured around a framework of interventions and outcomes.

Evidence impact summaries briefly describe how 3ie-supported evidence has informed and influenced decision makers. Each summary highlights verified instances of evidence impact.

We provide funding for replications, conduct in-house replication research and publish guidance on replication methodology. We also provide funding to original authors of 3ie-funded for preparing their raw datasets.

As part of our mandate as a knowledge producer and translator for our main audiences, we publish a range of knowledge products. These include briefs, impact evaluation reports, systematic review reports and summaries, replication papers, evidence gap map reports, scoping reports and working papers.

3ie’s Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (RIDIE) aims to enhance the transparency and quality of impact evaluation research before it begins.
Our work
- Working with governments
3ie’s evidence programmes support studies to fill critical knowledge gaps in a sector, sub-sector or in an area with limited rigorous evidence. We fund studies under a specific theme or which address a particular question or set of questions in programme areas where our donors want to expand global public knowledge of what works and what does not.

Improving adolescent sexual and reproductive health requires decision-makers to have evidence on what works or not, for whom and why, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (L&MIC).

Despite the availability of agricultural technologies, few smallholder farmers in developing economies adopt new inputs and practices. One of the factors preventing this is the lack of effective knowledge dissemination.

Agriculture is a major source of sustenance for rural populations in low- and middle income countries. But owing to weather, pests, diseases and price fluctuations, farmers face numerous risks, including crop and livestock losses.

The production and consumption of fish, a nutritious source of food for around one billion people, is rising globally. The bulk of aquaculture still originates from small-scale farming in developing countries, such as Bangladesh.

According to the United Nations estimates, 103 million youth worldwide lack basic literacy skills, and more than 60 per cent of them are women.

3ie is working with USAID’s Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG Center), and NORC at the University of Chicago to increase knowledge on the global advancement of democracy, human rights and governance.

South Asia, home to 600 million children, has the highest number of young people globally. While these youth contribute to the social and economic stability and prosperity of their families, communities and countries, they face several threats to their health, education and protection, including pressures to drop out of education, become child workers, marry and reproduce early.

3ie projects and programs are uncovering ways to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment. Our cross-cutting work seeks to inform what makes development interventions gender-sensitive and transformative in low- and middle-income countries, including challenging fragile contexts.

3ie, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is supporting studies and other work on HIV combination prevention to maximize the useful knowledge and policy implications from these interventions.

To gain a better understanding of whether providing HIV self-tests to people would increase HIV testing rates, and who might benefit most from availability of tests, 3ie funded seven pilot interventions and their impact evaluations in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia.

The Saamuhika Shakti or Collective Impact initiative aims to improve the lives of waste pickers in Bengaluru, in India’s southern state of Karnataka, through a coordinated multi-sectoral approach.

We are supporting the generation of rigorous evidence in humanitarian contexts on interventions related to water, sanitation and hygiene, food security, multi-sectoral humanitarian programming and interventions targeting malnutrition.

In alignment with our mission, 3ie promotes rigorous, efficient, and ethical use of innovative data sources for impact evaluations, including in those conducted by 3ie, by 3ie research partners, and in the global development community more broadly.

A major challenge in the fight against vaccine-preventable deaths and diseases is the limited evidence available on innovative and successful community-based approaches for expanding immunization coverage in countries with low or stagnating vaccination rates.

Much of the evidence surrounding the integration of HIV services with maternal, neonatal, and child health services, as well as with sexual and reproductive health and family planning services, does not come from rigorous studies.

Widespread hunger, malnutrition, and water insecurity have devastating and long-lasting impacts on the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe.

With more than three billion people living in contexts that are highly vulnerable to climate change (IPCC Report 2022), mitigation and adaptation strategies are essential to minimize the long-term effects of climate warming. 3ie’s climate change research program focuses on promoting evidence-informed policies and programs to strengthen climate mitigation efforts.

3ie, the World Health Organization and the Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health worked together to create a gap map to assess the evidence available on social, behavioural and community engagement interventions related to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health programs in low and middle-income countries.

Everyone needs reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food. However, all too often, this need is not fulfilled. Despite best efforts, significant gaps persist between global nutrition targets and actual achievements.

Fragility has expensive, long-term consequences and trying to build peace in situations of protracted conflicts is becoming the norm. In 2016, 1.8 billion people – nearly a quarter of the world's population – were living in situations of fragility. Social cohesion is widely considered important in building sustainable peace in fragile contexts.

Safe sanitation is a key determinant of many public health outcomes and ending open defecation is necessary in order to achieve safe sanitation. To this end, the Indian government has led a massive sanitation program, Swachh Bharat Abhiyan - Gramin, to improve latrine access and use.

Launched in 2011, the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM) aims to link the rural poor in India to sustainable livelihood opportunities and financial services.

We set up our Replication Programme to address the need for a freely available global public good that helps improve the quality and reliability of impact evaluation evidence used for development decision-making. Replication is the most established method of research validation in science, yet it has not been fully embraced by the research community or development donors, leading to this gap.

3ie, in partnership with the Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC), developed this program to build the evidence base in L&MICs and to support global efforts towards increasing equitable access to and use of WASH services.

We support impact evaluations to build the evidence base on the effectiveness of interventions that reduce the risks faced by the poor through participation in public works and employment programmes.

3ie, with support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is undertaking a learning study to understand the barriers and facilitators in programs related to fecal sludge and septage management in the states of Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Telangana.

3ie, in partnership with the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), is working to strengthen evidence use in MCC’s program designs and investment decisions. 3ie will support MCC to ensure their economic modelling, project design and evaluation approaches are at the cutting edge of development science while simultaneously building a repository of learning that benefits other policymakers and funders.

India has one of the lowest female labor force participation rates in South Asia. Among rural women, less than 30 per cent are engaged in productive work, paid or unpaid.

The natural resource governance sector is under-researched and programs in it are under-evaluated. 3ie supported seven impact evaluations to fill critical knowledge gaps on what works to improve governance in the extractives sector in low- and middle-income countries.

3ie champions the research transparency and reproducibility movement as a means of understanding and mitigating challenges to the credibility of social science research, while also working toward stronger integration of ethical principles into practice.

It is widely recognized that preventive measures are crucial in tackling the HIV epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. Three randomized controlled trials and numerous observational studies have shown that male circumcision reduces HIV acquisition by approximately 60 per cent for men, suggesting that efforts to increase male circumcision can play a significant role in HIV prevention.

.

3ie, in partnership with the Philippines National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) and Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, is implementing a multi-year Philippines Evidence Program (also known as Policy Window Philippines).

Working in collaboration with the Office of the Prime Minister, the primary aim is to improve developmental outcomes through evidence-informed decision making in Uganda. 3ie is currently supporting evaluation of government programmes around youth livelihood, family planning, public service delivery and local governance, and universal primary education.

3ie and the government of Benin are working on a a multi-year regional initiative that aims to promote the institutionalization of evaluation in government systems across eight countries in West Africa, including: Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Togo.
Funding
- Open opportunities
View our current funding opportunities for evaluations, systematic reviews and internal replication studies.

Publication Type: Other evaluations

Country: Nigeria

Region: Sub-Saharan Africa (includes East and West Africa)

Sector: Health Services

3ie evidence programme: Innovations in Increasing Immunisation Evidence Programme
Author(s): Ngozi Akwataghibe, Elijah Ogunsola, Oluwafemi Popoola, Adanna Emeji, Marjolein Dieleman
Institutional affiliation(s): Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam; Ogun State Primary Health Care Development Board, Nigeria; University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Grant-holding institution: Royal Tropical Institute Amsterdam
Main implementing agency: Ogun State Primary Health Care Development Board, Nigeria
Sex disaggregation: Yes
Gender analysis: Yes
Equity focus: Yes
Dataset: Available

Context

In 2005, Nigeria adopted the Reach Every Ward strategy to improve vaccination coverage for children 0-23 months old. By 2015, Ogun State in the southwestern region had achieved full immunisation coverage in 12 out of 20 of its local government areas (LGAs). However, the remaining areas continued to face barriers to achieving full immunisation coverage, with the highest proportion of unimmunised children belonging to the Remo North LGA. The participatory evaluation and participatory action research (PAR) approach was introduced to provide context-specific solutions to increase immunisation coverage in Remo North.

Intervention design

The intervention used the PAR approach to identify community-related factors that hinder immunisation coverage and find contextually relevant solutions to problems. It identified the needs and expectations of communities with respect to immunisation services for infants and children, matched services to those needs, as well as to the expectations of health workers and the local government. This was done by putting together a contextually relevant joint action plan. The PAR commenced with a baseline study (situational analysis) using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The situational analysis informed the first round of dialogue among health workers, community members and the local government to develop a joint action plan, which was implemented over four months. Researchers then assessed progress, which informed a second round of dialogue. The participants developed a second joint action plan, which was again implemented over four months.

The PAR approach focused on collaboration among the community members, health workers and the local government as a way of engaging local people in decisions concerning them. This approach rested on three key assumptions:

The communities, local governments and health workers would actively participate in the process and take ownership. This would enable the development and implementation of contextually relevant solutions to address the identified barriers to immunisation uptake.
Different groups in the community would be able to voice their views openly regarding immunisation services, and their views would be heard by health workers and the local government.
This approach would build and improve the capacity of the local government and health workers, and enable them to improve the delivery of health services.

Evaluation design and methodology

This study was carried out in Ipara and Ilara wards in the Remo North LGA, Nigeria. These two were the best and worst performing wards in terms of immunisation coverage. Quantitative methods included a household survey targeted at caregivers, a secondary analysis of the National Health Management Information Systems data, and a cost-effectiveness analysis of the PAR approach. Qualitative methods included in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with policymakers, local government officials, community leaders, health workers, PAR participants and community members. During baseline, the research team conducted a gender analysis to discern how gendered power dynamics affect household decision-making on immunisation.

Primary evaluation questions

This study answers the following questions:

What is the effectiveness of the PAR approach in relation to improving immunisation coverage in the Remo North LGA?
How efficient was the PAR approach in the delivery of the Reach Every Ward strategy in the intervention areas?
What lessons have been learned in using the PAR approach to improve immunisation services for Nigeria?
Does the PAR approach present opportunities for a sustainable solution to immunisation access, utilisation and coverage in Nigeria?

Primary findings

The PAR process was successful in helping the community in Ilara gain access to health services. Through this intervention, the community was able to revitalise the Ilara healthcare facility, which meant that the community members no longer had to travel to Ipara to avail health services.

An assessment of the health management information system data indicates that immunisation coverage in the Ilara ward increased from 26 to 59 per cent. For Ipara, coverage for all the antigens except measles remained high. The significant decline in measles coverage was ascribed to persisting cultural barriers and the reduction in clientele to the Ipara healthcare facility due to revitalisation of the healthcare facility in Ilara.

An analysis of the wealth quintile data collected indicates that children from poor households were 1.58 times more likely to be fully immunised than children from poorest households. The qualitative data indicates that men were primary decision makers about who gets vaccinated within the household, as well as in the community. Decisions taken by women, including whether or not to immunise their children, had to be approved by men. During the focus group discussions, participants brought up issues regarding adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). They expressed that most people in the communities know the importance of immunisation and yet some people refused to have their children immunised due to fear of adverse reactions. However, due to community mobilisation as per the PAR action plan, there was increased sensitisation towards immunisation and its benefits in the community. A high proportion of caregivers

had changed their perceptions about AEFI. The increased awareness, particularly in the Ilara community, led to a decrease in fear among the community members about AEFI.

A limitation of this study is that the PAR could not change major flaws in the system. For instance, the governance arrangement around the health system was outside the influence of this approach. Additionally, some contextual elements like health staff strikes and high turnover were outside the control of the PAR.

Implications

The authors recommend a full impact evaluation, with careful attention to design and a counterfactual, so as to ascertain the effectiveness of the PAR intervention and its replicability.

Ogun stresses need for immunization, Galaxy TV

Related publications

Exploring Factors Influencing Immunization Utilization in Nigeria—A Mixed Methods Study, Frontiers, Dec 2019